FS Trucking, Inc. and Fausto Sotelo v. Stacey Harrison

Court of Appeals of Texas

FS Trucking, Inc. and Fausto Sotelo v. Stacey Harrison

DecidedAugust 8, 2024

Docket11-23-00201-CV

StatusPublished

This text of FS Trucking, Inc. and Fausto Sotelo v. Stacey Harrison (FS Trucking, Inc. and Fausto Sotelo v. Stacey Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

FS Trucking, Inc. and Fausto Sotelo v. Stacey Harrison, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

FS Trucking, Inc. and Fausto Sotelo, * From the 244th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. C-23-03-0349-CV.

Vs. No. 11-23-00201-CV * August 8, 2024

Stacey Harrison, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there was reversible error in the denial of Appellants’ motion to dismiss. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we reverse the trial court’s denial of Appellants’ motion to dismiss, and we remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Stacey Harrison.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

FS Trucking, Inc. and Fausto Sotelo, * From the 244th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. C-23-03-0349-CV.

Vs. No. 11-23-00201-CV * August 8, 2024

Stacey Harrison, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there was reversible error in the denial of Appellants’ motion to dismiss. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we reverse the trial court’s denial of Appellants’ motion to dismiss, and we remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Stacey Harrison.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

FS Trucking, Inc. and Fausto Sotelo v. Stacey Harrison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fs-trucking-inc-and-fausto-sotelo-v-stacey-harrison-texapp-2024.