Fryer v. State
183 S.E.2d 616, 124 Ga. App. 312, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 907
Opinion
Appeal was taken from the verdict and judgment and there was no enumeration of error on the overruling of the motion for a new trial which contains the same [313]*313grounds as the enumeration of errors. Hence, under that which was held in Tiller v. State, 224 Ga. 645 (164 SE2d 137), the law of the case was established as to the grounds contained in the enumeration of errors and the judgment appealed from must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fryer v. State, 183 S.E.2d 616, 124 Ga. App. 312, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 907 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).
183 S.E.2d 616 (Fryer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moss v. Strother Ford, Inc.
187 S.E.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Parrott v. State
184 S.E.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)