Frye v. Tucker

24 Ill. 180
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Breese, J.

That a railroad company can take a promissory note and negotiate it in the ordinary course of their business, cannot be questioned. It is a power inherent in all such corporations. The assignment by the company, was prima facie their act through their authorized officer. If it was not their act, it should have been denied by affidavit. McIntire v. Preston, 5 Gilm. 60.

The entry on the docket of the justice of the peace identified the note, and was sufficient. But if it was not, it could make no difference, as on the appeal the case is tried de novo in the Circuit Court, all formal objections of every kind being overlooked, the only inquiry being, had the justice of the peace jurisdiction. Swingley v. Haynes, 22 Ill. R. 216.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frye v. Tucker, 24 Ill. 180 (Ill. 1860).

24 Ill. 180 (Frye v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corn Belt Bank v. Forman
264 Ill. App. 589 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1932)
Lay v. Austin
25 Fla. 933 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1889)
Goodrich v. Reynolds, Wilder & Co.
31 Ill. 490 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1863)