Frye v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Frye v. State

1932 OK CR 162, 14 P.2d 430, 54 Okla. Crim. 38, 1932 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 164

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 2, 1932

DocketNo. A-8398.

StatusPublished

This text of 1932 OK CR 162 (Frye v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frye v. State, 1932 OK CR 162, 14 P.2d 430, 54 Okla. Crim. 38, 1932 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 164 (Okla. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Woodward county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of whisky and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

Defendant occupied an apartment at a rooming house in the city of Woodward with his family in which house were several other apartments. Defendant’s family was away and he had a guest. The proprietor called the police who went to the apartment house and the proprietor directed him to defendant’s apartment and claimed they were making a noise and disturbing other occupants of the house. They went there and hearing some loud talking inside entered, arrested defendant, and took him to the city hall and preferred charges against him. They later returned to the apartment house and with the consent of the proprietor entered defendant’s rooms, searched them, *39 and found about a gallon and a half of whisky. The police officers had no warrant or search warrant. The defendant contends the search of his residence was unlawful. The contention must be sustained. At the time the police officers entered the residence of defendant he was committing no offense in their presence and the entry and subsequent search are in violation of section 30, art. 2, State Const.

The case is reversed, and remanded with instructions to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Woodward county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of whisky and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

Defendant occupied an apartment at a rooming house in the city of Woodward with his family in which house were several other apartments. Defendant’s family was away and he had a guest. The proprietor called the police who went to the apartment house and the proprietor directed him to defendant’s apartment and claimed they were making a noise and disturbing other occupants of the house. They went there and hearing some loud talking inside entered, arrested defendant, and took him to the city hall and preferred charges against him. They later returned to the apartment house and with the consent of the proprietor entered defendant’s rooms, searched them, *39 and found about a gallon and a half of whisky. The police officers had no warrant or search warrant. The defendant contends the search of his residence was unlawful. The contention must be sustained. At the time the police officers entered the residence of defendant he was committing no offense in their presence and the entry and subsequent search are in violation of section 30, art. 2, State Const.

The case is reversed, and remanded with instructions to dismiss.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1932 OK CR 162, 14 P.2d 430, 54 Okla. Crim. 38, 1932 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frye-v-state-oklacrimapp-1932.