Frye v. State
This text of 438 S.E.2d 86 (Frye v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence showed that Aubrey Tremel Frye chased down Andre Farrar and then shot and killed him with a handgun in retaliation for the victim having stolen drugs from Frye. Frye was convicted of malice murder, and sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirm.1
1. Considered in the light most favorable to the verdict, we hold that the evidence of appellant’s guilt of malice murder was sufficient to satisfy the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
2. As regards Frye’s contention of ineffective assistance of counsel, our review of the motion for new trial hearing shows that Frye did not satisfy the standards for establishing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668 (104 SC 2052, 80 LE2d 674) (1984); Peavy v. State, 262 Ga. 782 (2) (425 SE2d 654) (1993).
3. Frye’s enumerations of error regarding instructions given the jury have not been preserved for appeal. See Anderson v. State, 262 Ga. 331 (2) (418 SE2d 39) (1992).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 S.E.2d 86, 263 Ga. 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frye-v-state-ga-1994.