Frye v. Scott
3 D.C. 294
This text of 3 D.C. 294 (Frye v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Frye v. Scott, 3 D.C. 294 (circtddc 1828).
Opinion
The Court (nem. con.) overruled the objections, saying that it was not necessary that the appointment of Perley, by the two other arbitrators should be in writing; nor that the award should state that the two had disagreed before they appointed Perley. These facts may be proved by parol.
Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 D.C. 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frye-v-scott-circtddc-1828.