Frye v. Planche

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Frye v. Planche

552 A.2d 550, 1989 Me. LEXIS 4

DecidedJanuary 12, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 552 A.2d 550 (Frye v. Planche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frye v. Planche, 552 A.2d 550, 1989 Me. LEXIS 4 (Me. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Contrary to Albert Frye’s contention, the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Fritzsche, J.) properly granted summary judgment on Frye’s complaint to the defendants, Leone H. Planche, Mark Austin, Thomas Burgess, Milton Calder, Joseph Charron, Ronald Legere and Thomas Ryan, on the ground that Frye failed to serve notice as required by 14 M.R.S.A. § 8107(4) (Supp.1988). See Darling v. Augusta Mental Health Institute, 535 A.2d 421, 430 (Me.1987).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI