Frye v. Phœnix Assurance Co.

252 A.D. 916, 300 N.Y.S. 991, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6789

This text of 252 A.D. 916 (Frye v. Phœnix Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frye v. Phœnix Assurance Co., 252 A.D. 916, 300 N.Y.S. 991, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that a verdict establishing incendiarism is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for defendants in an action under fire insurance policies. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D. 916, 300 N.Y.S. 991, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frye-v-phnix-assurance-co-nyappdiv-1937.