Frye v. Phœnix Assurance Co.
This text of 252 A.D. 916 (Frye v. Phœnix Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that a verdict establishing incendiarism is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for defendants in an action under fire insurance policies. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 916, 300 N.Y.S. 991, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frye-v-phnix-assurance-co-nyappdiv-1937.