Frye v. Phœnix Assurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frye v. Phœnix Assurance Co.

252 A.D. 916, 300 N.Y.S. 991, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6789

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 5, 1937·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that a verdict establishing incendiarism is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for defendants in an action under fire insurance policies. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that a verdict establishing incendiarism is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for defendants in an action under fire insurance policies. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Frye v. Phœnix Assurance Co., 252 A.D. 916, 300 N.Y.S. 991, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

252 A.D. 916 (Frye v. Phœnix Assurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.