Frye v. New York Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frye v. New York Telephone Co.

278 A.D.2d 197, 716 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12593

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 197 (Frye v. New York Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frye v. New York Telephone Co., 278 A.D.2d 197, 716 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated August 24, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment is denied.

Under the circumstances, there are issues of fact as to whether there was an agreement to pay the plaintiff the sum of $50,000 (see, CPLR 3212). Accordingly, the defendant is not entitled to summary judgment. Florio, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated August 24, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment is denied.

Under the circumstances, there are issues of fact as to whether there was an agreement to pay the plaintiff the sum of $50,000 (see, CPLR 3212). Accordingly, the defendant is not entitled to summary judgment. Florio, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 197, 716 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frye-v-new-york-telephone-co-nyappdiv-2000.