Frye v. Frye
896 So. 2d 836, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 2005 WL 405494
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 2005·No. No. 1D04-2367·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant Stephen Frye appeals the Final Judgment of Modification entered by the trial court changing the primary residence of the parties’ minor children. Because appellee has neither alleged nor demonstrated through proof the requisite elements for a change of their minor sons’ custody, we reverse. See Zediker v. Zediker, 444 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Accordingly, the Final Judgment of Modification is REVERSED and VACATED to the extent it pertains to the minor sons, including changes to their custody and support payments.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frye v. Frye, 896 So. 2d 836, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 2005 WL 405494 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
896 So. 2d 836 (Frye v. Frye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aponte v. State
896 So. 2d 836 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)