Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Frye v. Frye

Frye v. Frye

896 So. 2d 836, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 2005 WL 405494
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 22, 2005
DocketNo. 1D04-2367
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 896 So. 2d 836 (Frye v. Frye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frye v. Frye, 896 So. 2d 836, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 2005 WL 405494 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Stephen Frye appeals the Final Judgment of Modification entered by the trial court changing the primary residence of the parties’ minor children. Because appellee has neither alleged nor demonstrated through proof the requisite elements for a change of their minor sons’ custody, we reverse. See Zediker v. Zediker, 444 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Accordingly, the Final Judgment of Modification is REVERSED and VACATED to the extent it pertains to the minor sons, including changes to their custody and support payments.

WOLF, C.J., KAHN AND POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aponte v. State
896 So. 2d 836 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
896 So. 2d 836, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 2005 WL 405494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frye-v-frye-fladistctapp-2005.