Frye v. Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Frye v. Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad

47 Me. 523

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1860·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Davis, J.,

There is no allegation in the writ that the locomotive causing the fire was in the use of the Atlantic and St. Lawrence Railroad Company, or the Grand Trunk Railway Company, their lessees. The demurrer must be sustained. •

The plaintiff, at Nisi Prius, may have leave to amend upon payment of costs up to the time when his amendment was offered, and in no event to recover costs accruing before that time.

Tenney, C. j., and Appleton, Cutting, Goódenow and Kent, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Davis, J.,

There is no allegation in the writ that the locomotive causing the fire was in the use of the Atlantic and St. Lawrence Railroad Company, or the Grand Trunk Railway Company, their lessees. The demurrer must be sustained. •

The plaintiff, at Nisi Prius, may have leave to amend upon payment of costs up to the time when his amendment was offered, and in no event to recover costs accruing before that time.

Tenney, C. j., and Appleton, Cutting, Goódenow and Kent, JJ., concurred.

Frye v. Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad, 47 Me. 523 (Me. 1860).

Pincite

47 Me. 523 (Frye v. Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.