Frye Chevrolet Co. v. Holder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Frye Chevrolet Co. v. Holder

217 N.C. 794

DecidedApril 10, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 217 N.C. 794 (Frye Chevrolet Co. v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frye Chevrolet Co. v. Holder, 217 N.C. 794 (N.C. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff instituted action on a note wbicb it was alleged defendant J. C. Edmisten bad endorsed. Tbis defendant denied that be bad endorsed tbe note, or authorized anyone to sign bis name thereto. Tbe jury accepted tbe defendant’s version of tbe transaction and rendered verdict in bis favor. On tbe record, we find no ruling of tbe court below wbicb would justify setting aside tbe verdict and judgment. Tbe plaintiff’s assignments of error cannot be sustained.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff instituted action on a note wbicb it was alleged defendant J. C. Edmisten bad endorsed. Tbis defendant denied that be bad endorsed tbe note, or authorized anyone to sign bis name thereto. Tbe jury accepted tbe defendant’s version of tbe transaction and rendered verdict in bis favor. On tbe record, we find no ruling of tbe court below wbicb would justify setting aside tbe verdict and judgment. Tbe plaintiff’s assignments of error cannot be sustained.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 N.C. 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frye-chevrolet-co-v-holder-nc-1940.