Fryberger v. Motter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Fryberger v. Motter

24 Pa. Super. 317, 1904 Pa. Super. LEXIS 174

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 14, 1904

DocketAppeal, No. 153

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 Pa. Super. 317 (Fryberger v. Motter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fryberger v. Motter, 24 Pa. Super. 317, 1904 Pa. Super. LEXIS 174 (Pa. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The note on which this judgment was founded was signed in 1894, the judgment thereon was entered in 1899, and neither defendant made any attempt to have it opened until February, 1908. The contradictory testimony and the delay in seeking relief furnished sufficient reason to justify the court, acting as a chancellor and controlled by equitable principles, in making the decree it did: Hirschlan v. Krechman, 20 Pa. Superior Ct. 227; Shannon v. Castner, 21 Pa. Superior Ct. 294.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The note on which this judgment was founded was signed in 1894, the judgment thereon was entered in 1899, and neither defendant made any attempt to have it opened until February, 1908. The contradictory testimony and the delay in seeking relief furnished sufficient reason to justify the court, acting as a chancellor and controlled by equitable principles, in making the decree it did: Hirschlan v. Krechman, 20 Pa. Superior Ct. 227; Shannon v. Castner, 21 Pa. Superior Ct. 294.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Pa. Super. 317, 1904 Pa. Super. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fryberger-v-motter-pasuperct-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack