Fry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fry v. State

882 S.W.2d 766, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1401, 1994 WL 475565

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 6, 1994·No. No. 65288·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Gerald L. Fry, appeals from the Lincoln County Circuit Court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the circuit court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Gerald L. Fry, appeals from the Lincoln County Circuit Court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the circuit court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Fry v. State, 882 S.W.2d 766, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1401, 1994 WL 475565 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

882 S.W.2d 766 (Fry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.