Fry v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Fry v. State

822 S.W.2d 849, 308 Ark. 97, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 23

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 21, 1992

DocketRC 91-56

StatusPublished

This text of 822 S.W.2d 849 (Fry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fry v. State, 822 S.W.2d 849, 308 Ark. 97, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 23 (Ark. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Bennie L. Fry, Jr., by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Tom Garner, admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

The motion is, therefore, granted.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI