Fry v. Smith
This text of 61 Ohio St. (N.S.) 276 (Fry v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the circuit court is in accordance with the settled interpretation of the statute in question. Niehaus v. Faul, 43 Ohio St., 63; 54 Ohio St., 664, affirming Carter et al. v. Ross, 8 C. C. Rep., 139, upon grounds stated in the opinion of the circuit court.
The right of the debtor to the exemption is as strong when his property is being sold and its proceeds distributed under the forms of equity as when that result is being reached by legal process. Comer et al. v. Dodson et al., 22 Ohio St., 615.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 Ohio St. (N.S.) 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fry-v-smith-ohio-1899.