Fry v. Smith

61 Ohio St. (N.S.) 276
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 28, 1899·Published

Opinion

By the Court:

The judgment of the circuit court is in accordance with the settled interpretation of the statute in question. Niehaus v. Faul, 43 Ohio St., 63; 54 Ohio St., 664, affirming Carter et al. v. Ross, 8 C. C. Rep., 139, upon grounds stated in the opinion of the circuit court.

The right of the debtor to the exemption is as strong when his property is being sold and its proceeds distributed under the forms of equity as when that result is being reached by legal process. Comer et al. v. Dodson et al., 22 Ohio St., 615.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fry v. Smith, 61 Ohio St. (N.S.) 276 (Ohio 1899).

61 Ohio St. (N.S.) 276 (Fry v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Feigley v. Whitaker
22 Ohio St. 606 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1872)