Fry v. Ritch

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Fry v. Ritch

138 A. 138, 106 Conn. 730, 1927 Conn. LEXIS 173

DecidedJune 28, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A. 138 (Fry v. Ritch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fry v. Ritch, 138 A. 138, 106 Conn. 730, 1927 Conn. LEXIS 173 (Colo. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was tried in connection with the companion case of Fry v. Taylor, ante, p. 387. The assault and battery for which plaintiff seeks to recover damages is alleged to have occurred in the course of the dispossession of the plaintiff described in the companion case. The trial court has found the facts adversely to the plaintiff’s claims. The finding was not made without evidence, but on conflicting evidence. The corrections sought in the appeal cannot, under our rules, be made. Aside from the claimed corrections, there is no question of law properly raised on the appeal.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case was tried in connection with the companion case of Fry v. Taylor, ante, p. 387. The assault and battery for which plaintiff seeks to recover damages is alleged to have occurred in the course of the dispossession of the plaintiff described in the companion case. The trial court has found the facts adversely to the plaintiff’s claims. The finding was not made without evidence, but on conflicting evidence. The corrections sought in the appeal cannot, under our rules, be made. Aside from the claimed corrections, there is no question of law properly raised on the appeal.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A. 138, 106 Conn. 730, 1927 Conn. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fry-v-ritch-conn-1927.