Fry v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

94 F.2d 1014, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1035, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4575, 20 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1035
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 1938
DocketNo. 7403
StatusPublished

This text of 94 F.2d 1014 (Fry v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fry v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 94 F.2d 1014, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1035, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4575, 20 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1035 (6th Cir. 1938).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion.

The late Judge MOORMAN joined in conférence decision but died before it could be prepared and announced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 F.2d 1014, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1035, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4575, 20 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fry-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca6-1938.