Frutchey v. Lutz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Frutchey v. Lutz

31 A. 638, 167 Pa. 337, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 906

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 8, 1895

DocketAppeal, No. 25

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 A. 638 (Frutchey v. Lutz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frutchey v. Lutz, 31 A. 638, 167 Pa. 337, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 906 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

It being conceded that the money attached in the hands of the Scranton Traction Co., garnishee, was due Oliver E. Lutz for wages earned by him as a street car conductor in the employ of said garnishee, the learned judge of the court below rightly held that it was not attachable, even on a judgment based on a claim for wages. There was therefore no error in reversing the proceedings against the garnishee. Neither of the assignments of error is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

It being conceded that the money attached in the hands of the Scranton Traction Co., garnishee, was due Oliver E. Lutz for wages earned by him as a street car conductor in the employ of said garnishee, the learned judge of the court below rightly held that it was not attachable, even on a judgment based on a claim for wages. There was therefore no error in reversing the proceedings against the garnishee. Neither of the assignments of error is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A. 638, 167 Pa. 337, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frutchey-v-lutz-pa-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack