Fruit Growers Express Co. v. McClure
339 So. 2d 314, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15975
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 23, 1976
DocketNos. 76-1451, 76-1533
StatusPublished
This text of 339 So. 2d 314 (Fruit Growers Express Co. v. McClure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fruit Growers Express Co. v. McClure, 339 So. 2d 314, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15975 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Gaboury v. Flagler Hospital, Inc., 316 So.2d 642 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), where the rule is stated:
“The granting or refusal of the application for change of venue is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed upon review absent a demonstration of a palpable abuse or grossly improvident exercise of discretion. See, McMichael v. Harris, 127 Fla. 861, 174 So. 323 (1939); Spalding v. Von Zamft, 180 So.2d 208 (3rd DCA Fla.1965); Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Hardee, 167 So.2d 68 (3rd DCA Fla. 1964).”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Spalding v. Von Zamft
180 So. 2d 208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Gaboury v. Flagler Hospital, Inc.
316 So. 2d 642 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
McMichael v. Harris
174 So. 323 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Hardee
167 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
339 So. 2d 314, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fruit-growers-express-co-v-mcclure-fladistctapp-1976.