Frucher v. Kaye's Auto Exchange, Inc.

74 A.D.2d 709
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered March 14, 1979 in Columbia County, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment and granted the motion of defendant Milroy Chevrolet, Inc., to serve an answer. We are unable to detect any abuse of discretion in Special Term’s decision which refused to grant a default judgment to plaintiffs against the codefendant, Milroy Chevrolet, Inc. The delay in answering the complaint was of relatively brief duration. It was satisfactorily explained as arising from the failure of defendant’s insurer to receive notice of the action until shortly before the instant motion was'made. The existence of potentially meritorious defenses to this negligence action was obvious and the default itself can hardly be characterized as a willful abandonment of the matter. Accordingly, the order appealed from should be affirmed (see Bishop v Galasso, 67 AD2d 753; West v Tracy, 56 AD2d 695). Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frucher v. Kaye's Auto Exchange, Inc., 74 A.D.2d 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

74 A.D.2d 709 (Frucher v. Kaye's Auto Exchange, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Picotte Realty, Inc. v. Aragona
87 A.D.2d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Spickerman v. State
85 A.D.2d 60 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)