Frouge Corp. v. Hartert
22 A.D.2d 773, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2771
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 17, 1964
StatusPublished
This text of 22 A.D.2d 773 (Frouge Corp. v. Hartert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Frouge Corp. v. Hartert, 22 A.D.2d 773, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).
Opinion
Motion for leave to prosecute under the Appendix System denied as unnecessary. Under rule V of the rules of this court an appeal may be prosecuted as of right upon a record or statement authorized by CPLR 5526, 5527, 5528 at appellant’s option. Concur — Botein, P. J., Brietel, Rabin, Yalente and McNally, JJ
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
22 A.D.2d 773, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frouge-corp-v-hartert-nyappdiv-1964.