Frost v. Wiggins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Frost v. Wiggins

21 Ark. 403

DecidedJuly 15, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ark. 403 (Frost v. Wiggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frost v. Wiggins, 21 Ark. 403 (Ark. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fairchild

delivered the opinion of the court.

Although the plaintiff did not obtain judgment in the court below, to which he was clearly entitled, on the facts proven, as presented in the bill of exceptions, yet The State Bank vs. Conway, 13 Ark. 344, disposes of this, as on the trial before the court, as a jury, no principle of law was asked to be declared as applicable to the case, and no motion was made for a new-trial.

The plaintiff simply excepted to the finding and judgment of the court, but the bill of exceptions brings nothing before this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Fairchild

delivered the opinion of the court.

Although the plaintiff did not obtain judgment in the court below, to which he was clearly entitled, on the facts proven, as presented in the bill of exceptions, yet The State Bank vs. Conway, 13 Ark. 344, disposes of this, as on the trial before the court, as a jury, no principle of law was asked to be declared as applicable to the case, and no motion was made for a new-trial.

The plaintiff simply excepted to the finding and judgment of the court, but the bill of exceptions brings nothing before this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ark. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frost-v-wiggins-ark-1860.