Frost v. Treasurer of the State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Frost v. Treasurer of the State

302 S.W.3d 250, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 62, 2010 WL 286642

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 26, 2010·No. ED 93236·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirm *251 ing the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirm *251 ing the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Frost v. Treasurer of the State, 302 S.W.3d 250, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 62, 2010 WL 286642 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

302 S.W.3d 250 (Frost v. Treasurer of the State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.