Frost v. Town of East Hampton
This text of 97 A.D.2d 810 (Frost v. Town of East Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to declare void as confiscatory defendant’s zoning ordinance as it applies to plaintiff’s building lot and to direct defendant to issue a building permit, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), dated June 3,1983, which denied his motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff’s motion was properly denied. Triable issues of fact exist. Further, an issue concerning the adequacy of the purported administrative remedy also exists. Moflen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 A.D.2d 810, 468 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frost-v-town-of-east-hampton-nyappdiv-1983.