Frost v. Tausik Brothers, LLC

774 N.E.2d 752, 98 N.Y.2d 686, 746 N.Y.S.2d 687, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1887
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 774 N.E.2d 752 (Frost v. Tausik Brothers, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frost v. Tausik Brothers, LLC, 774 N.E.2d 752, 98 N.Y.2d 686, 746 N.Y.S.2d 687, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1887 (N.Y. 2002).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
774 N.E.2d 752, 98 N.Y.2d 686, 746 N.Y.S.2d 687, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frost-v-tausik-brothers-llc-ny-2002.