Frost v. State

47 S.E. 901, 120 Ga. 311, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 534
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 8, 1904·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Evans, J.

The defendant -was indicted for the offense of playing and betting at cards. The evidence disclosed that in a certain house one of the persons named in the indictment was lying on the floor, supported on his elbows, with his head from under the bed, shuffling a deck of cards. The others were arranged around in a circle, in the center of which was thirty or forty cents in nickels. The defendant was included among those who were in ° the circle, and was on his knees. This was the tableau which met the gaze of the police officer and another person who was with him, when, without warning, they entered the house. The jury could infer from this evidence the defendant’s guilt, and their finding, approved by the trial judge, will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frost v. State, 47 S.E. 901, 120 Ga. 311, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 534 (Ga. 1904).

47 S.E. 901 (Frost v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellis v. State
138 S.E. 257 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Schley v. State
103 S.E. 799 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Washington v. State
24 Ga. App. 65 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Haines v. State
95 S.E. 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Freeman v. State
94 S.E. 588 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Davis v. State
51 S.E. 501 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)