Frost v. State

695 So. 2d 914, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7180, 1997 WL 345987
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 1997·No. No. 96-106·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marcille Robert Frost appeals a judgment of convictions and sentences. Although we find no error as to defendant’s convictions, we correct the judgment to show that the conviction for attempted second degree murder with a firearm is a first degree felony. See Newbold, v. State, 667 So.2d 996 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). We also vacate defendant’s sentence as it is based on an incorrect score-sheet: the scoresheet improperly reflects the level of the primary offense at conviction and improperly imposes a law enforcement protection multiplier. In recalculating the scoresheet to resentenee defendant, the offense level must be redetermined and the multiplier may not be applied where, as here, defendant did not commit any of the enumerated violations set forth in section 921.0014, Florida Statutes (1995). Accordingly, we affirm defendant’s convictions, as modified, vacate his sentence, and remand for resentenc-ing.

Convictions affirmed, as modified; sentence vacated; and cause remanded for re-sentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frost v. State, 695 So. 2d 914, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7180, 1997 WL 345987 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

695 So. 2d 914 (Frost v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newbold v. State
667 So. 2d 996 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)