Frost v. Mazda Motor of America

542 S.E.2d 209, 351 N.C. 354, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 1154
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 3, 2000·No. No. 582P99·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion by defendant for temporary stay allowed 3 February 2000. Petition by defendant (Primus Automotive Financial Services, Inc.) for writ of certiorari to review the orders of the North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 2 March 2000. Petition by defendant (Primus Automotive Financial Services, Inc.) for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County allowed 2 March 2000. Petition by defendant (Primus) for writ of supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals allowed 2 March 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frost v. Mazda Motor of America, 542 S.E.2d 209, 351 N.C. 354, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 1154 (N.C. 2000).

542 S.E.2d 209 (Frost v. Mazda Motor of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frazier v. Murray
542 S.E.2d 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2000)