Frost v. LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant Appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our earlier opinion, and substitute the following opinion in its place.
Appellant challenges the summary judgment in favor of Lorillard Tobacco Company, Vector Group, Ltd., Inc., and Liggett Group, LLC (collectively “Appellees”) in this Engle 1 -progeny case. Appellant argues that: (1) summary judgment was premature; (2) summary judgment was improper because Appellees did not prove the absence of fact issues; and (3) summary judgment was improper as to the civil conspiracy count. We affirm the trial court’s summary judgment on all counts, except the civil conspiracy count. As to that count, we adopt the well-reasoned opinion of our sister court in Rey v. Philip Morris, Inc., 75 So.3d 378 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). 2
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
. Engle v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla.2006).
. At oral argument, counsel alerted this Court that Vector Group, Ltd., had not been a defendant in Engle and might have other defenses not yet addressed below. For clarity, our decision today only addresses issues that were properly before us.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
85 So. 3d 1209 (Frost v. LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.