Frost v. Illes

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 5, 2005
• Docket: 05-6268
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6268

ROBERT FROST, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MIKE D. ILLES, Administrator, in his official capacity and Individual capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 05-6643

MIKE D. ILLES, Administrator, in his official capacity and Individual capacity,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-04-943-8-17BI; CA-04-943-8-JFA)

Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 5, 2005 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Frost, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Robert Frost, Jr., appeals

the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Frost v. Illes, Nos. CA-04-943-8-17BI; CA-04-

943-8-JFA (D.S.C. filed Feb. 7, 2005 & entered Feb. 8, 2005;

Mar. 23, 2005). We deny Frost’s motion for relief from judgment

and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -