Frost v. BNSF Railway Company

District Court, D. Montana·Decided October 2, 2019·No. 9:15-cv-00124·Unknown

Opinion

INTHE UNITED STATES DisTRIcTcourt Ep FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA OCT 4 MISSOULA DIVISION Ce ue 2019 Prsrig Ofte Court MICHAEL A. FROST, CV 15-124-M—-DWM Plaintiff, V. ORDER BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant.

Plaintiff Michael A. Frost moves for leave to file his Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Motions in Limine and eight related exhibits under seal on the ground that the documents are subject to the parties’ Confidentiality Agreement. Parties seeking to file under seal must demonstrate that the harm from disclosure outweighs the public’s interest in open access to judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978). Frost has not done so here. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (Doc. 199) is DENIED. DATED this D4 ay of October, 2019. \ ul UW ne District Judge United/States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frost v. BNSF Railway Company, (D. Mont. 2019).

Frost v. BNSF Railway Company (Frost v. BNSF Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.
435 U.S. 589 (Supreme Court, 1978)