Frost National Bank, as Successor Trustee of the Robyn M. Rogers Marital Deduction Trust v. Kanaly Trust Company, as Trustee of the Robyn M. Rogers Marital Deduction Trust

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 15, 2004
Docket13-03-00636-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Frost National Bank, as Successor Trustee of the Robyn M. Rogers Marital Deduction Trust v. Kanaly Trust Company, as Trustee of the Robyn M. Rogers Marital Deduction Trust (Frost National Bank, as Successor Trustee of the Robyn M. Rogers Marital Deduction Trust v. Kanaly Trust Company, as Trustee of the Robyn M. Rogers Marital Deduction Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frost National Bank, as Successor Trustee of the Robyn M. Rogers Marital Deduction Trust v. Kanaly Trust Company, as Trustee of the Robyn M. Rogers Marital Deduction Trust, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-636-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________


FROST NATIONAL BANK, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF

THE ROBYN M. ROGERS MARITAL DEDUCTION TRUST,       Appellant,


v.


KANALY TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ROBYN

M. ROGERS MARITAL DEDUCTION TRUST,                          Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________


On appeal from Probate Court No. 2 of Harris County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, FROST NATIONAL BANK, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE ROBYN M. ROGERS MARITAL DEDUCTION TRUST, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by Probate Court No. 2 of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 326222. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, the parties state that this case has been settled. In accordance with the settlement agreement, the parties move that the Court dismiss this appeal.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

                                                                                 PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 15th day of April, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Frost National Bank, as Successor Trustee of the Robyn M. Rogers Marital Deduction Trust v. Kanaly Trust Company, as Trustee of the Robyn M. Rogers Marital Deduction Trust, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frost-national-bank-as-successor-trustee-of-the-robyn-m-rogers-marital-texapp-2004.