Frost & Adams v. Saltonstall
129 F. 481, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2247
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts·Decided November 12, 1887·No. No. 2,892·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
At the close of the argument the court ruled that this notice furnished a good excuse for not filing a protest June 17th, and made a protest filed on the 18th valid.
Motion allowed, and judgment entered for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frost & Adams v. Saltonstall, 129 F. 481, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2247 (circtdma 1887).
129 F. 481 (Frost & Adams v. Saltonstall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern California Loan Asso. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 223 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)