Frost & Adams v. Saltonstall
129 F. 481, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2247
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedNovember 12, 1887
DocketNo. 2,892
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 129 F. 481 (Frost & Adams v. Saltonstall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Frost & Adams v. Saltonstall, 129 F. 481, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2247 (circtdma 1887).
Opinion
At the close of the argument the court ruled that this notice furnished a good excuse for not filing a protest June 17th, and made a protest filed on the 18th valid.
Motion allowed, and judgment entered for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Southern California Loan Asso. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 223 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
129 F. 481, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frost-adams-v-saltonstall-circtdma-1887.