Froslid v. Hults

199 N.E.2d 166, 14 N.Y.2d 722, 250 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1210
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 30, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 N.E.2d 166 (Froslid v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Froslid v. Hults, 199 N.E.2d 166, 14 N.Y.2d 722, 250 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1210 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

Motion granted and appeal dismissed upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Cross motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hoskin
295 A.2d 454 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.E.2d 166, 14 N.Y.2d 722, 250 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/froslid-v-hults-ny-1964.