Frosco Food Club Plan, Inc. v. Dennison

18 Misc. 2d 241, 192 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3464
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 16, 1959·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this action to recover a balance due under a written agreement alleged to have been assumed orally by the defendant, the evidence clearly indicates that the latter bound [242] himself as a principal debtor primarily liable for the obligation here involved. Consequently, his promise does not come within the operation of the Statute of Frauds.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $30 costs to the plaintiff, and judgment directed for plaintiff in the sum of $484.15, with appropriate costs in .the court below.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frosco Food Club Plan, Inc. v. Dennison, 18 Misc. 2d 241, 192 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

18 Misc. 2d 241 (Frosco Food Club Plan, Inc. v. Dennison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Culkin v. Smith
57 Misc. 2d 901 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. Pell City Pipe & Foundry Co.
37 Misc. 2d 123 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)