Frooks v. Peck

35 Misc. 2d 177, 232 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3877
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 8, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 Misc. 2d 177 (Frooks v. Peck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frooks v. Peck, 35 Misc. 2d 177, 232 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A husband’s common-law obligation to answer for his wife’s necessary expenses terminated upon the severance of the marital relationship. Therefore, legal services rendered to a former wife in connection with a proceeding to vacate a prima facie valid divorce decree of a sister State, which proceeding was discontinued, are not necessaries for which the former husband is liable.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs and judgment directed for defendant dismissing the complaint, with costs.

Concur — Heoht, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel
368 F. Supp. 51 (S.D. New York, 1973)
Pressinger, Wigg & Goodstein v. Revson
67 Misc. 2d 988 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Misc. 2d 177, 232 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frooks-v-peck-nyappterm-1962.