Frooks v. Peck
This text of 35 Misc. 2d 177 (Frooks v. Peck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A husband’s common-law obligation to answer for his wife’s necessary expenses terminated upon the severance of the marital relationship. Therefore, legal services rendered to a former wife in connection with a proceeding to vacate a prima facie valid divorce decree of a sister State, which proceeding was discontinued, are not necessaries for which the former husband is liable.
The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs and judgment directed for defendant dismissing the complaint, with costs.
Concur — Heoht, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Misc. 2d 177, 232 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frooks-v-peck-nyappterm-1962.