Frontier Pilots Litigation Steering Committee, Inc. v. Cohen, Weiss & Simon

227 A.D.2d 130, 641 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4748
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered April 7, 1995, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judg[131]*131ment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs have failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to their claims that they were not union members, that their employment contract was not negotiated through the collective bargaining process, or that they had separately retained defendant law firm to represent them. Therefore, plaintiffs’ legal malpractice claims are preempted by Federal labor law, since they arise out of defendants’ representation of the union, as its agent, during the course of collective bargaining (see, Peterson v Kennedy, 771 F2d 1244, 1259 [9th Cir], cert denied 475 US 1122; Montplaisir v Leighton, 875 F2d 1, 6 [1st Cir]). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frontier Pilots Litigation Steering Committee, Inc. v. Cohen, Weiss & Simon, 227 A.D.2d 130, 641 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

227 A.D.2d 130 (Frontier Pilots Litigation Steering Committee, Inc. v. Cohen, Weiss & Simon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mamorella v. Derkasch
276 A.D.2d 152 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Niezbecki v. Eisner & Hubbard, P. C.
186 Misc. 2d 191 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1999)