Frontier Park v. Assessor of Town of Babylon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frontier Park v. Assessor of Town of Babylon

11 A.D.3d 461, 782 N.Y.S.2d 360, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11555

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 4, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.3d 461 (Frontier Park v. Assessor of Town of Babylon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frontier Park v. Assessor of Town of Babylon, 11 A.D.3d 461, 782 N.Y.S.2d 360, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In a consolidated proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7 to review certain real property tax assessments on the petition[462]*462er’s property, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rossetti, J.), entered January 3, 2003, as, after a nonjury trial, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that it failed to demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the subject property was overassessed (see Matter of Fourth Garden Park v Assessor of Town of Riverhead, 271 AD2d 531 [2000]; Matter of City of Troy v Kusala, 227 AD2d 736 [1996]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a consolidated proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7 to review certain real property tax assessments on the petition[462]*462er’s property, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rossetti, J.), entered January 3, 2003, as, after a nonjury trial, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that it failed to demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the subject property was overassessed (see Matter of Fourth Garden Park v Assessor of Town of Riverhead, 271 AD2d 531 [2000]; Matter of City of Troy v Kusala, 227 AD2d 736 [1996]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.3d 461, 782 N.Y.S.2d 360, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frontier-park-v-assessor-of-town-of-babylon-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack