Frontenac v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
80 N.E.2d 455, 297 N.Y. 998, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1071
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, and with one bill of costs to the defendant-respondent Beacon Chemical Corporation against plaintiff and the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frontenac v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 80 N.E.2d 455, 297 N.Y. 998, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1071 (N.Y. 1948).
80 N.E.2d 455 (Frontenac v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Copher v. Barbee
361 S.W.2d 137 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1962)
Hyams v. King Kullen Grocery Co.
32 Misc. 2d 920 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1961)