Frontenac Hotel Co. v. Schwarz
228 A.D. 790
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order denying motion of defendant Harry Peek to dismiss complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to said defendant to answer within twenty days from service of a copy of the order herein upon payment of such costs. (Mailer of Atlas, 217 App. Div. 38, 41.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frontenac Hotel Co. v. Schwarz, 228 A.D. 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
228 A.D. 790 (Frontenac Hotel Co. v. Schwarz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Horowitz
138 Misc. 794 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1931)