Frontenac Hotel Co. v. Schwarz

228 A.D. 790
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 228 A.D. 790 (Frontenac Hotel Co. v. Schwarz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frontenac Hotel Co. v. Schwarz, 228 A.D. 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Order denying motion of defendant Harry Peek to dismiss complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to said defendant to answer within twenty days from service of a copy of the order herein upon payment of such costs. (Mailer of Atlas, 217 App. Div. 38, 41.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Horowitz
138 Misc. 794 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D. 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frontenac-hotel-co-v-schwarz-nyappdiv-1930.