Frontenac Bank v. Sierra Land Co. I, LLC

325 S.W.3d 551, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1393, 2010 WL 4075562

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph and Deborah Nothum (“the Not-hums”) and Sierra Land Company I, LLC (“Sierra”) (collectively “Appellants”) ap peal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Frontenac Bank (“Respondent”) on its motion. Appellants claim two points on appeal. First, Appellants claim that the trial court erred in granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment because Respondent’s breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing creates a genuine issue of material fact. Second, Appellants claim that the trial court erred in granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment because it disregarded Appellants’ evidence as to the value of the property.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).