Froncek v. State

888 So. 2d 664, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16644, 2004 WL 2481368
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 5, 2004
DocketNo. 2D04-2004
StatusPublished

This text of 888 So. 2d 664 (Froncek v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Froncek v. State, 888 So. 2d 664, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16644, 2004 WL 2481368 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

In this certiorari proceeding, Edward Froncek challenges the circuit court’s denial of his motion to mitigate sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). We deny the petition for writ of certiorari. See Brantley v. Holloway, 685 So.2d 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Because Froncek’s motion also alluded to a scoresheet error, our disposition is without prejudice to Froncek’s right to raise the issue in a motion filed under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) or 3.850.

Petition for certiorari denied.

STRINGER, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., Senior Judge, concur. , ;-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brantley v. Holloway
685 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
888 So. 2d 664, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16644, 2004 WL 2481368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/froncek-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.