Fromowitz v. Fromowitz

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Fromowitz v. Fromowitz

721 A.2d 40, 317 N.J. Super. 63, 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 502

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided December 22, 1998·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from that portion of a judgment of divorce that addresses equitable distribution and imputed income to plaintiff for alimony purposes. The judgment, however, expressly reserved determination as to the amount of alimony and counsel fees, rendering the judgment interlocutory.

“[Defendant] has no right to appeal the adverse portions of the incomplete judgment without leave of this court.” Frantzen v. Howard, 132 N.J.Super. 226, 227, 333 A.2d 289 (App.Div.1975); R. 2:2-4. We therefore dismiss this appeal from an order incorrectly represented to this court by both counsel as disposing of all issues as to all parties.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from that portion of a judgment of divorce that addresses equitable distribution and imputed income to plaintiff for alimony purposes. The judgment, however, expressly reserved determination as to the amount of alimony and counsel fees, rendering the judgment interlocutory.

“[Defendant] has no right to appeal the adverse portions of the incomplete judgment without leave of this court.” Frantzen v. Howard, 132 N.J.Super. 226, 227, 333 A.2d 289 (App.Div.1975); R. 2:2-4. We therefore dismiss this appeal from an order incorrectly represented to this court by both counsel as disposing of all issues as to all parties.

Dismissed.

Fromowitz v. Fromowitz, 721 A.2d 40, 317 N.J. Super. 63, 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 502 (N.J. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

721 A.2d 40 (Fromowitz v. Fromowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related