Fromowitz v. Fromowitz

721 A.2d 40, 317 N.J. Super. 63, 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 502
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedDecember 22, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 721 A.2d 40 (Fromowitz v. Fromowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fromowitz v. Fromowitz, 721 A.2d 40, 317 N.J. Super. 63, 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 502 (N.J. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from that portion of a judgment of divorce that addresses equitable distribution and imputed income to plaintiff for alimony purposes. The judgment, however, expressly reserved determination as to the amount of alimony and counsel fees, rendering the judgment interlocutory.

“[Defendant] has no right to appeal the adverse portions of the incomplete judgment without leave of this court.” Frantzen v. Howard, 132 N.J.Super. 226, 227, 333 A.2d 289 (App.Div.1975); R. 2:2-4. We therefore dismiss this appeal from an order incorrectly represented to this court by both counsel as disposing of all issues as to all parties.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frantzen v. Howard
333 A.2d 289 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
721 A.2d 40, 317 N.J. Super. 63, 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fromowitz-v-fromowitz-njsuperctappdiv-1998.