Fromme v. Poerschke

95 N.Y.S. 525
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 27, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 525 (Fromme v. Poerschke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fromme v. Poerschke, 95 N.Y.S. 525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from involves no part of the merits and affects no substantial right. It is simply declaratory of the fact, which is not disputed, that the defendant by his neglect to serve a case on appeal had waived or abandoned his right to do so; for there is no significant difference between the wprd “abandoned,” used in the order, and the word “waived,” used in rule 33. The order has not in any wise affected the right of either party, and the worst that can be said of it is that it was unnecessary.

As it does not affect any right, it is not appealable, and the appeal must be dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levine v. Proser
83 Misc. 134 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Shubert Theatrical Co. v. Ziegfeld
113 N.Y.S. 801 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y.S. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fromme-v-poerschke-nyappterm-1905.