Fromm v. Sierra Nevada Silver Mining Co.

61 Cal. 629, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 679
California Supreme Court·Decided November 1, 1882·No. No. 7,338·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The Court:

Section 3336 of the Civil Code is as follows: “ The detriment caused by the wrongful conversion of personal property is presumed to be: 1. The value of the property at the time of the conversion, with interest from that time; or, where the action has been prosecuted with reasonable diligence, the highest market value of the property at any time between the conversion and the verdict, without interest, at the option of the injured party.” * * *

The conversion in this case took placé on the twenty-sixth day of March, 1879, and the action was brought on the twenty-third day of May," 1879. The only point made on the appeal is, that the action should have been brought at an earlier day. But we are of the opinion that there was reasonable diligence in bringing the action, within the meaning of the Code:

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fromm v. Sierra Nevada Silver Mining Co., 61 Cal. 629, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 679 (Cal. 1882).

61 Cal. 629 (Fromm v. Sierra Nevada Silver Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Morgan Hill v. Bushey
423 P.3d 960 (California Supreme Court, 2018)
Woltz v. E. F. Hutton & Co.
204 P. 248 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)
Potts v. Paxton
153 P. 957 (California Supreme Court, 1915)
Clapp v. Vatcher
99 P. 549 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)
London, Paris & American Bank v. Aronstein
117 F. 601 (Ninth Circuit, 1902)
Ralston v. Bank of California
44 P. 476 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Thompson v. Schaetzel
42 N.W. 765 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1889)