Fromm v. MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY
712 N.W.2d 445, 474 Mich. 1118
Opinion
Lisa Michelle FROMM and Edward Fromm, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae are considered. The motion to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and CORRIGAN, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fromm v. MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY, 712 N.W.2d 445, 474 Mich. 1118 (Mich. 2006).
712 N.W.2d 445 (Fromm v. MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DEPARTMENT OF EDUC. v. Grosse Pointe Public Schools
712 N.W.2d 445 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)