Fromm v. MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY
This text of 712 N.W.2d 445 (Fromm v. MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lisa Michelle FROMM and Edward Fromm, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae are considered. The motion to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and CORRIGAN, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
712 N.W.2d 445, 474 Mich. 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fromm-v-meemic-insurance-company-mich-2006.