Fromm v. Huhn

123 A. 612, 95 N.J. Eq. 728, 10 Stock. 728, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 885
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 25, 1924·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

[732]*732For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskirk, Clark—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fromm v. Huhn, 123 A. 612, 95 N.J. Eq. 728, 10 Stock. 728, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 885 (N.J. 1924).

123 A. 612 (Fromm v. Huhn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neel H. Patel v. Bhoomika Patel
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
Tasto v. Tasto
68 A.2d 324 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Bournonville v. Cain
145 A. 482 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)
Keller v. Linsenmyer
139 A. 33 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)