Fromm v. Herbert Silk Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fromm v. Herbert Silk Co.

246 A.D. 537

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion of defendant Herbert Silk Co., Inc., to strike the case

from the calendar of preferred causes reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The plaintiff, not having been a resident of Kings county at the time that the alleged cause of action arose or at the present time, is not entitled to a preference under rule 6 of the Calendar Rules of Kings County. Lazansky, P. J., Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur. See ante, p. 534.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion of defendant Herbert Silk Co., Inc., to strike the case

from the calendar of preferred causes reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The plaintiff, not having been a resident of Kings county at the time that the alleged cause of action arose or at the present time, is not entitled to a preference under rule 6 of the Calendar Rules of Kings County. Lazansky, P. J., Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur. See ante, p. 534.]

Fromm v. Herbert Silk Co., 246 A.D. 537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 537 (Fromm v. Herbert Silk Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related