Fromm v. Fish & Wildlife Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Fromm v. Fish & Wildlife Commission

555 P.2d 932, 27 Or. App. 417, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1426

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 15, 1976

DocketCA 6622

StatusPublished

This text of 555 P.2d 932 (Fromm v. Fish & Wildlife Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fromm v. Fish & Wildlife Commission, 555 P.2d 932, 27 Or. App. 417, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1426 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case petitioner seeks judicial review of respondent’s order entered pursuant to a contested case hearing refusing to renew petitioner’s guide license. Respondent concedes that "* * * there is not substantial evidence in the record to support the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order. Accordingly, the matter should be remanded to the respondent for further proceedings.”

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case petitioner seeks judicial review of respondent’s order entered pursuant to a contested case hearing refusing to renew petitioner’s guide license. Respondent concedes that "* * * there is not substantial evidence in the record to support the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order. Accordingly, the matter should be remanded to the respondent for further proceedings.”

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

555 P.2d 932, 27 Or. App. 417, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fromm-v-fish-wildlife-commission-orctapp-1976.